Reproductive freedom, reproductive rights, reproductive health care: Abortion of truth at the Democratic National Convention

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris at 2024 Democratic National Convention

Reproductive freedom, reproductive rights, reproductive health care

Abortion of truth at the Democratic National Convention

Hendrik van der Breggen

When the topic of abortion came up at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, truth got dismembered.

How so? By lots of talk about justifying abortion as “reproductive freedom,” “reproductive rights,” and “reproductive health care.”

Thinking people should, well, think.

 

Reproductive freedom justifies abortion?

No, it doesn’t.

Reproduction, i.e., the creation of a child (pre-natal human being/person) conceived via sex, occurs before abortion takes place. Reproductive freedom is exercised before abortion takes place.

The late Michael Bauman, Professor of Theology and Culture at Hillsdale College, observes:

"When pro-choicers have unforced sex, they are choosing. That is freedom of choice. When they decide to kill the child conceived during that sexual encounter, that is freedom from choice. They chose; now they want to be free from the consequences of that choice, even if someone has to die."

In other words, justifying abortion via “reproductive freedom” is a ruse.

Note: The hard cases — rape, incest, threat to life of the mother — to which many abortion-choice proponents point as justification for abortion account for fewer than 5 percent of all abortion cases. In his 2015 book The Abortion Wars ethicist Charles Camosy reports that the number for the hard cases is 2 percent. But here (and at the DNC) we’re not talking about the hard cases, so don’t get sidetracked.

Again, to justify abortion — i.e., 95–98 percent of all abortions — via “reproductive freedom” is a ruse.

 

Reproductive rights justify abortion?

No, they don’t.

Every adult has to right to reproduce. That is, every adult has a right to reproduce via consensual sex if they are biologically capable and, preferably (for the sake of the children), if they are married.

But, again, reproduction occurs before abortion takes place. This means that the exercise of one’s right to reproduce occurs before abortion takes place, too. (If this is unclear, re-read previous point about reproductive freedom.)

So justifying abortion via “reproductive rights” is also a ruse.

Reminder: Along with reproductive rights come reproductive responsibilities. Parents have duties to their children. The first duty is to care for children, not kill them. Other duties include provision of food, clothing, shelter, education — and lots of love.

 

Reproductive health care justifies abortion?

No, it doesn’t.

Dr. Kendra Kolb, a neonatologist, states this: “There is no medical reason why the life of the child must be directly and intentionally ended with an abortion procedure.”

Kolb adds: Yes, treatments for ectopic pregnancies occur, but they’re not abortions per se, if we use language accurately. Yes, treatments for heart disease or cancer can involve pre-term deliveries that might result in the death of a child, but they’re not abortions per se, if we use language accurately. When we accurately define “abortion” as the direct and intentional ending of a pre-natal human being’s life, abortions are not medically necessary.

 

Abortion, then, is not health care at all, let alone reproductive health care.

 

So justifying abortion via “reproductive health care” is yet another ruse.

 

Don’t be fooled

That the premeditated killing of pre-natal human beings via abortion is justified by reproductive freedom, reproductive rights, or reproductive health care is simply not true.

Folks, don’t be fooled by the falsehoods.

 

 

Hendrik van der Breggen, PhD, is a retired philosophy professor (formerly at Providence University College, Manitoba, Canada).

 

 

For additional thought

 

• Kendra Kolb, The Pro-Life Reply to: “Is Abortion Ever Medically Necessary?” (video)
• Hendrik van der Breggen, Trudeau is Gaslighting Canadians about Abortion (article)
• Hendrik van der Breggen, Untangling popular “pro-choice” claims and arguments concerning abortion (article)
• Hendrik van der Breggen, Untangling Popular Pro-Choice Arguments: Critical Thinking about Abortion (book)

Thoughtcrimes

APOLOGIA

By Hendrik van der Breggen

The Carillon, June 9, 2016

Thoughtcrimes

“Recent history shows us that the conscience can be so corrupted and manipulated that today's unthinkable becomes tomorrow's thinkable with remarkable speed.” – C. Everett Koop & Francis A. Schaeffer, Whatever Happened to the Human Race? (1983)

Like Winston Smith, the protagonist in George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984, I entertain politically incorrect thoughts. What follows are a few of those thoughts, some of which may soon become illegal to express. They're disconnected and perhaps disconcerting—read at your own risk.

● “Physician-assisted dying”: euphemism: not merely medical help to let terminally ill die peacefully and painlessly; includes active killing of another who requests suicide, whether terminally ill or not; positive attitudes associated with the acceptance of medical help when death runs its course are transferred (without argument) to other cases wherein doctors kill; effective in manipulating opinions of public that feels rather than thinks.

● Wittingly or unwittingly, able-bodied persons who would choose physician-assisted suicide if they were seriously disabled and suffering communicate this message to people who are presently seriously disabled and suffering: We would rather be dead than be like you. Hashtag: Culture of Death.

● May I suggest a new psychological disorder for the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)? PHOBIA OF BEING LABELED PHOBIC. This is a fear of or aversion to expressing disagreement on radical public policy issues (e.g., men in women's bathrooms) because one wants always to be liked and appear “progressive” (or “on the right side of history” or “2016-ish”); in adults the dread of being called “phobic” may be so intense that paralysis results, even as children are put at risk; in democracies, fascist-leaning politicians and ideologues exploit this fear to halt critical discussion or keep it from getting started; formerly known as cowardice.

● My pipe tobacco pouch has warnings from Health Canada. According to researcher Thomas Coy, “The risk of HIV from sexual contact for MSM (men who have sex with men) was approximately 150 times greater than the heterosexual male population in 2010.” Coy adds: “According to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) the risk of lung cancer for men who smoke is 23 times greater than for men who do not smoke.” Should Gay Pride Parades display warnings from Health Canada, too? (Further reading: Is promoting same-sex sex wise? Be sure also to read my replies to my critics.)

● Gens Hellquist, executive director of pro-gay Canadian Rainbow Health Coalition (in a 2009 statement): “There are all kinds of health issues that are endemic to our [gay] community… We have higher rates of anal cancer in the gay male community….”

● Bruce (“Caitlyn”) Jenner is not a woman. He is a “feminized” man, i.e., a man trying to look like a woman.

● According to Bill C-16, “gender identity” and “gender expression” are to become part of the Canadian Human Rights Act and Canada's Criminal Code. But Facebook, which had 58 gender identities, now has “unlimited” gender identities. So which identities and expressions should be included in the HRA and CC? What about the 52-year-old Canadian man who identifies as a 6-year-old girl?

● If my feelings about myself are sufficient justification for my identity, then why stop at transgender (i.e., identifying as a woman in a man's body)? Why not trans-age (an adult identifying as a child)? Why not trans-species (identifying as a dog or cat or dragon in a human body)? Hashtag: The emperor of subjectivity (as sole criterion for objective truth) has no clothes.

● Promote “diversity”?  But wait. There is diversity due to God's abundantly variegated and good creation AND there are diverse forms of brokenness due to the Fall/ moral rebellion. That is, there are diverse goods and diverse bads. Which “diversity” do you mean?

● Ethicist and theologian Russell Moore: “John the Baptist lost his head for saying that Herod could not have his brother’s wife. Some now will be targeted as culturally unacceptable because they tell Herod he can’t BE his brother’s wife.”

● “Dear world: Did you not read my book? Sincerely, G. Orwell."  - Facebook

(Hendrik van der Breggen, PhD, is associate professor of philosophy at Providence University College. The views in this column do not always reflect the views of Providence.)