"Death Skull" by Philippe de Champaigne (1602-1674) |
APOLOGIA
By Hendrik van der Breggen
The
Carillon,
October 12, 2017
Resisting
the Culture of Death (two ways)
1. Support Bill 34
I support Manitoba's Bill 34, which
provides conscience rights to healthcare professionals who refuse to kill or
help kill patients.
Introduced by Health Minister Kelvin Goertzen,
this bill is presently making its way through the Manitoba legislature.
Why is Bill 34 important? Because
medicine should care for those who suffer, not kill them.
Also, we should heed the lessons of
history.
Consider this passage from Dr. Leo
Alexander (1905-1985), medical advisor to the U.S. Chief of Counsel at the
Nuremberg Trials, in which representative Nazis were convicted of crimes
against humanity (this is from Dr. Alexander's paper "Medical Science Under
Dictatorship," New England Journal of Medicine, July 4, 1949):
"Whatever proportions these
crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who investigated them that
they had started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a
subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitude of the physicians. It started
with the acceptance of the attitude, basic in the euthanasia movement, that
there is such a thing as life not worthy to be lived."
Dr. Alexander continues: "This
attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and
chronically sick. Gradually the sphere of those to be included in the category
was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically
unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans."
Dr. Alexander warns: “But it is important
to realize that the infinitely small wedged-in lever from which this entire
trend of mind received its impetus was the attitude toward the
nonrehabilitatable sick."
I don't believe a Nazi Party is on
Canada's horizon (thank goodness). But I do believe that some philosophical
principles of what Pope John Paul II (1920-2005) called the “culture of death" are
becoming prevalent in our society.
Medical, social, and psychological
problems require medical, social, and psychological solutions—not killing.
If we're concerned about suffering
patients, then we should increase the quality and availability of palliative
care, not require doctors to kill.
2. Stop discrimination
against pro-life Members of Parliament
I think the Liberals' blocking of
pro-life MP Rachael Harder as chair of Canada's Status of Women committee is
unjust.
Yes, I have pro-life biases. So don't
take my word on this. Instead, consider the following extended quote from the pro-choice
editors of The Globe and Mail:
“The Liberal government of Justin Trudeau
has sent a terrible message by blocking the election of a Conservative MP to
the position of chair of the House of Commons committee on the status of women
solely because of her opposition to abortion."
“Think of it this way: Were Rachael
Harder, the Alberta MP in question, fired from a job in a private company, or
from the public service, for the same reason, she would be the victim of a
violation of her Charter rights...."
“The right to abortion is one we support,
but there is a higher principle at play here—the right to hold beliefs, and to
act on them legally, without interference from the government, and without
being discriminated against by society."
“The Liberal government's shameful
actions this week send a contrary message—that it is perfectly acceptable in
Canada to discriminate against people who oppose abortion."
Some pundits defend the Liberals by arguing
that a pro-life appointment to the Status of Women committee is like appointing
a racist to the Human Rights Commission. But this is a faulty analogy.
Racists have no good reasons for their
racism. However, pro-lifers like Harder have good reasons for their pro-life
position. There is scientific evidence, e.g., biological humanity of the unborn,
and moral principle, i.e., all human beings have the right to life—whether
young or old, black or white.
Canada's Supreme Court ruled in 1988 that
Canada's parliament should limit abortion justly, suggesting a gestational-age
approach. To date, Canada's governments have failed us.
Most Canadians now favour at least some abortion
restrictions: e.g., no abortion merely because baby is a girl, no late-term
abortions.
Clearly, our democratic government should
encourage parliamentary debate, not unjust discrimination that favours the
culture of death.
Hendrik
van der Breggen, PhD, teaches philosophy at Providence University College. The
views expressed in this column do not always reflect the views of Providence.
For further reading on the issues of abortion and physician-assisted suicide (a.k.a. medical assistance in dying), please see Apologia archives for my columns on these topics.
For an insightful 3-minute video by some Manitoba healthcare professionals who favour Bill 34, please see Call for Conscience - Manitoba.
For further reading on the issues of abortion and physician-assisted suicide (a.k.a. medical assistance in dying), please see Apologia archives for my columns on these topics.
For an insightful 3-minute video by some Manitoba healthcare professionals who favour Bill 34, please see Call for Conscience - Manitoba.
No comments:
Post a Comment