APOLOGIA
By
Hendrik van der Breggen
The Carillon, March 19, 2015
Jesus or Muhammad?
In
today's postmodern religious world, much emphasis is on story. But I find
myself asking: how do I arbitrate between competing religious stories? How do I
arbitrate between, say, Christianity and Islam? Who should I follow—Jesus or
Muhammad?
My
answer: Jesus. Why? Because publicly accessible historical evidence favours
Jesus, not Muhammad. Here is a summary of relevant historical evidence.
Jesus
claims to be the God of the universe (the great I AM) come to earth as a human
being. He lives a life characterized by healings, compassion for the vulnerable,
and speaking truth to power. He claims he is the way, the truth, and the life,
and that nobody comes to God but through him.
Jesus
is accused of blasphemy, is unjustly sentenced to death, and dies a horrible, painful death on a cross. A couple days later, however, Jesus is
seen physically alive and well by various individuals and variously sized groups,
at different times, at different places, over a period of several weeks. (Not
so incidentally, the first witnesses to Jesus' resurrection are women, which
implies a high view of women, if Jesus is God.)
The
risen Jesus teaches that via his death and resurrection Jesus takes our
punishment for sin onto himself and he defeats the powers of death, and that his
resurrection is a sign for us to trust him—so we should repent and follow him.
Significantly,
the evidence for Jesus' life, death, and resurrection comes to us from eyewitnesses
and close associates of eyewitnesses. Significantly, too, historians and
scholars who don't succumb to anti-miraculous bias argue convincingly that the records concerning Jesus' life, death, and resurrection are believable.
The
focus of Islam is the man Muhammad and the Qur'an, the allegedly true and
complete revelation from God. Muhammad doesn't claim to be God; he claims to be
God's latest and greatest prophet.
According
to Muhammad, Jesus is an important prophet, but not God in human flesh. Nor did
Jesus die on the cross (somebody else did) and so Jesus didn't resurrect bodily
after death. Muhammad dies and stays dead.
Significantly,
all the Qur'an's revelations about Jesus come to Muhammad 600 years after Jesus
and 1,000 kilometers away via an (alleged) angel.
Significantly,
too, Muhammad's life reveals an extremely violent man bent on world domination
by force—and he teaches others to be and do likewise. (It's interesting that
the present leader of ISIS has a PhD in Islamic Studies.)
Muhammad
ordered his followers to kill "infidels," i.e., those who don't agree
with his views about himself and the Qur'an.
Moreover,
Muhammad ordered various assassinations. On one occasion, he ordered the
assassination of a mother of five (killed while she was breastfeeding one of
her children). Also, Muhammad beheaded over 500 Jewish men and teenage boys, while
his followers sold women and children into slavery.
Unlike
Jesus, who shed his own blood for others to spread his message of
reconciliation to God, Muhammad shed the blood of others to impose his message.
Also,
Muhammad had a low view of women (their testimony is worth half that of a man, more
women than men will be in hell), and he married a girl when she was six,
consummating the marriage three years later.
So,
Jesus or Muhammad?
I
respect my Muslim friends and neighbours, and I will defend their right to exercise
religious freedom (within what Princeton philosopher Robert P. George calls
"the broad limits of justice and the requirements of the common good").
Nevertheless, I choose Jesus.
Significantly,
the historical evidences for Jesus' life, death, and resurrection are close to
the events temporally and geographically, in fact, closer than Muhammad's—the
Qur'an's—claims to the contrary (because, as I mentioned, the historical
evidences for Jesus contain accounts of eyewitnesses and close associates of
eyewitnesses, whereas the Qur'an's testimony comes 600 years later and 1,000
kilometres away).
Thus,
the evidence for Jesus allows me to take Jesus seriously as God in human flesh.
(Hendrik van der Breggen, PhD, teaches
philosophy at Providence University College. The views in this column do not always reflect the views of Providence.)
Recommended resources:
- William Kilpatrick, Christianity, Islam, and Atheism (book)
- Nabeel Qureshi, Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus (book)
- Robert Spencer et al., Islam: What the West Needs to Know (online video)
- R.C. Sproul & Abdul Saleeb, The Dark Side of Islam (book)
- David Wood, Answering Muslims (website)
See, too, my Apologia columns on Islam:
3 comments:
Here is an important article: "Islam and Christianity not comparable" by Larry Taunton.
Another important article: "Let's stop expecting Islam to be Christian" by Joe Carter.
Here's comedian Steven Crowder's irreverent look at Jesus vs. Muhammad.
Post a Comment