APOLOGIA
By Hendrik van der Breggen
The Carillon, November 12, 2015
The Carillon, November 12, 2015
Various thoughts (again)
Sometimes I sit on our deck, quietly
puffing on my pipe, and I think. What follows are some of my thoughts. They're
somewhat disconnected and perhaps disconcerting—read at your own risk.
● The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba is asking
the public for feedback on "Physician Assisted Dying." Here's a wee
bit of feedback from me. Yes, I'm pretty sure we all want physician assisted
dying: please don't abandon us as we die, please provide clean sheets, food,
and morphine as death takes its course. Thank you. Oh, wait, sorry, I
misunderstood: you're actually wondering if I'd like for you to kill me? Maybe
the college should be asking the public for feedback on Physician Assisted SUICIDE. Just saying.
● The Supreme
Court of Canada says physician assisted suicide (er, I mean, "dying")
will be legal as of February 6, 2016. Doesn't this reflect poorly on all our
efforts on suicide prevention? Are only some suicides worth preventing? National
Suicide Prevention Week (revised): Monday to Thursday only?
● The survey
from Manitoba's College of Physicians and Surgeons tells us that
"Physicians must not impose their moral or religious beliefs about
physician assisted dying on patients." Hmmm. Isn't the college imposing
the moral belief that life is no longer the default position and so the patient
must choose to live or die? (Intellectual health warning: Somebody is having
their philosophical cake and eating it too.)
● Physician
assisted suicide imposes a terrible burden on the vulnerable. If life is no longer society's default position, then the most
vulnerable—the elderly, terminally ill, disabled—must justify their continued
existence. This is plain nasty—a kick in the teeth.
● "Progressive"
is sometimes a euphemism for "slippery" or "slither."
● Glamour Magazine has named Cecile Richards "Woman of the Year."
Yes, this is the woman in charge of Planned Parenthood, the organization that's
been killing unborn babies and selling baby parts. And, yes, this magazine
awarded the same title to the man Bruce/ "Caitlyn" Jenner. Clearly,
glamour ain't what it used to be.
● IVF (in vitro
fertilization) involves morally dubious practices and risks: (a)
destruction of multiple human embryos (human beings) to get one that
"sticks" (in the uterus); (b) possible abortion of excess children if
more than one embryo sticks; (c) ongoing frozen "leftovers"; (d) egg
harvesting at risk of women's health ("eggsploitation"); (e) increased
demand for surrogate mothers ("breeders"); (f) severing of ties to
one or more biological parents when anonymous donor sperm or eggs are used; (g)
turning of children into commodities. IVF? LOL (lots of lament).
● Science and physicalism/ materialism should be
distinguished. Why? Because science—a method (methods) of inquiry—and
physicalism/ materialism—a metaphysical philosophical view—might not wholly
overlap. We should be open to going wherever the evidence takes us. Maybe a
non-physical entity or being (e.g., an intelligent agent/ mind) is a better
explanation of the data?
● To dismiss
historical investigation of Jesus' miraculous physical resurrection because one
thinks that nature's regularities make such a special act by God maximally improbable
is to assume that nature's regularities express the whole of God's intentions
regarding God's actions, or it is to assume that God doesn't exist. But this is
question-begging. (Question-begging is a mistake in reasoning: it's to assume
as proven that which is at issue; it's to assume the conclusion in the
premises; it's to assume the outcome of an investigation before doing the
investigation; it's to put the cart before the horse; it's to commit a
philosophical sin—an abuse of reason.)
● Enlightenment/
autonomous reason was an abuse of reason. The problem wasn't reason per se; the
problem was the faulty, arrogant assumptions. Abuse or misuse is not a good
reason for disuse.
● Jesus is the
Logos and the Truth. Think carefully, for Christ's sake.
(Hendrik van der Breggen, PhD, teaches
philosophy at Providence University College. The views in this column do not always reflect the views of Providence.)
No comments:
Post a Comment