APOLOGIA
By
Hendrik van der Breggen
The Carillon, March 2, 2017
Questioning Islamophobia
There's much talk lately about
Islamophobia, so let's be clear on this at the get go: Muslims are people we
should love and respect—and welcome.
Although I disagree deeply with Islam
(the religion that centers itself on Muhammad and the Qur'an), I believe Jesus'
command to love my neighbour requires that I respect those with whom I disagree.
After all, all people—including Muslims—are made in the image of God.
But let's be clear on this, too: having
reasonable, evidence-based concerns about Islam—especially when adherents
closely follow the violent life and teachings of Muhammad—is not an instance of
Islamophobia.
Please note: I am NOT saying that all
Muslims are monolithic in their views, that all Muslims are terrorists or supporters
of ISIS, nor that any Muslims should be treated with prejudice or in any way
unjustly.
Rather, I am saying that we need to do
some careful thinking.
With this end in mind, let's assess a
meme I often see circulating on the internet.
The meme has two pictures with a caption
under each. The first picture is of a meeting of several white-robed-white-hooded
Ku Klux Klan members. The caption: “No-one thinks that these people are
representative of Christians.”
The second picture (immediately below the
first) is of a dozen black-garbed-black-masked ISIS fighters with weapons at
the ready. The caption: “So why do so many people think that these people are
representative of Muslims?”
The apparent implication: just as the KKK
isn't Christian, so too ISIS isn't Islamic.
Let's pause and think.
Most or all the Christians and Muslims I
know are decent people, and, yes, we should protect them from being
misrepresented. So far so good.
But the questions we should be asking are
these: Does the KKK actually follow the example and teachings of Jesus?
(Answer: clearly no.) Does ISIS actually follow the example and teachings of
Muhammad? (Answer: very apparently yes.)
The more I learn about the life and
teachings of Muhammad (see resource list below), the more I am convinced that
Muhammad was an extremely violent man bent on world domination by force—and he
teaches his followers to be and do likewise. (It's interesting that the present
leader of ISIS has a PhD in Islamic Studies.)
Unlike Jesus, who shed his own blood for
others to spread his message, Muhammad shed the blood of others to impose his
message.
Now consider the notion of phobia. A
phobia is an irrational or ungrounded fear, aversion, or hatred.
Consider arachnophobia, an irrational ungrounded
fear or hatred of spiders. Clearly, it's possible to have reasonable,
non-phobic concerns about some spiders if the spiders display evidence of being
harmful or lethal to humans.
In recent years I've seen too many public discussions shut down because people who raise important questions are dismissed as "phobic" when in fact they're not. The if-you-disagree-then-you're-phobic card is a smokescreen against truth—it's an ad hominem fallacy—and it misleads audiences untrained in logic.
In view of ISIS and its close affiliation with Muhammad's violent life and teachings, the challenge before us is threefold: (1) we should encourage Muslims who do not emulate Muhammad's violence to continue doing so; (2) we should challenge Islamic leaders whenever they preach Muhammad's violence as behaviour to be emulated; and (3) we should do 1 and 2 in such ways that show love, compassion, and respect to Muslims.
In recent years I've seen too many public discussions shut down because people who raise important questions are dismissed as "phobic" when in fact they're not. The if-you-disagree-then-you're-phobic card is a smokescreen against truth—it's an ad hominem fallacy—and it misleads audiences untrained in logic.
In view of ISIS and its close affiliation with Muhammad's violent life and teachings, the challenge before us is threefold: (1) we should encourage Muslims who do not emulate Muhammad's violence to continue doing so; (2) we should challenge Islamic leaders whenever they preach Muhammad's violence as behaviour to be emulated; and (3) we should do 1 and 2 in such ways that show love, compassion, and respect to Muslims.
Yes, this is no small challenge. It also
isn't Islamophobia.
Speaking truth and loving others can—and should—go hand in hand.
Speaking truth and loving others can—and should—go hand in hand.
Recommended resources:
- William Kilpatrick, Christianity, Islam, and Atheism (book)
- Nabeel Qureshi, Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus (book)
- Robert Spencer et al., Islam: What the West Needs to Know (online video)
- R.C. Sproul and Abdul Saleeb, The Dark Side of Islam (book)
- David Wood, Answering Muslims (website)
(Hendrik van der Breggen, PhD, is associate professor of philosophy at Providence University College.)
No comments:
Post a Comment