"The Ancient of Days" (1794) by William Blake |
By Hendrik van der Breggen
The Carillon, February 27, 2014
Origins,
Science, and the Bible (part 1)
I didn’t see the recent debate between atheistic evolutionist Bill Nye ("the science guy") and six-day-young-earth creationist Ken Ham, but based on what I’ve read about the debate (e.g., see my colleague Patrick Franklin's blog), and based on my background knowledge concerning Nye and Ham, it's clear that the Nye-versus-Ham debate was much too narrow in its approaches to the origins issues. Atheistic evolution and six-day-young-earth creationism are located at the extreme ends of a continuum that has several more models in between. Still, I think that debates are good to spur on careful thinking.
As for me, I favour those models that
at least allow the intelligent design hypothesis into the scientific
explanatory toolkit to compete as an account for any features in the universe which
smack of intelligent causes, if the features can be properly discerned as such
on the basis of public evidence and careful use of reason—i.e., on the basis of
careful science—whether the universe is old, young, or somewhere in between (I
believe it’s old).
Though I think that the various
(non-atheist) evolutionary theories are logically compatible with God (as a
means whereby God creates), I have doubts about whether they actually do a good
job of accounting for (a) life's origin and (b) the whole of life’s subsequent
diversity—but I'm no expert on this, so I'll let the scientists slug it out.
I also favour an understanding of the
Genesis account of the Bible that doesn't take a young-earth, literal six 24-hour day
interpretation as the only reasonable interpretation. It seems to me that the
text is open to other interpretations, which are at least as reasonable, if not
more reasonable.
Today, I don’t want to take issue with
any (other) of the goings-on at the Nye-Ham debate. Rather, I simply want to recommend
some resources for students, teachers, parents, and pastors who find the origins-science-Bible
questions interesting—and who might wish to pursue further investigation.
To help understand Genesis vis-à-vis contemporary
science, I recommend John Lennox's little book Seven Days that Divide the World: The Beginning according to Genesis and Science (Zondervan 2011). Lennox is a philosopher of science at Oxford
University. In recent years, Lennox has engaged in public debate with his
Oxford colleague, the popular atheist Richard Dawkins (author of The God Delusion).
To help understand scientists and their
disagreements about the origins of life and the role of evolution, I recommend
the website for Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture. (See too their website faith + evolution, which is a resource aimed especially to assist pastors, lay leaders, Sunday school teachers, and high school students.) The
Center for Science and Culture is a respectable intelligent design think tank
that questions the extent of evolution’s creative powers and argues that science
can detect intelligent causes in nature (sometimes, when evidence warrants).
For a helpful lecture that provides an
outline of the merits of intelligent design as a competing hypothesis in
science, I recommend Stephen C. Meyer’s “Intelligent Design: The most credible idea?” (YouTube 2012). Meyer is a philosopher of science, a senior fellow at
the Discovery Institute, and author of the books Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design(Harper 2009) and Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design (Harper
2013).
Of course, intelligent design is not
without its detractors, even within Christian circles. So I also recommend the
website for BioLogos.
BioLogos is a respectable theistic evolution think tank, founded
by Francis Collins. Collins is current director of
the U.S. National Institutes of Health, former director of the Human Genome
Research Institute, recipient of the U.S. National Medal of Science, plus
author/co-author of the popular books The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief (Free Press 2006)
and The Language of Science and Faith: Straight Answers to Genuine Questions (InterVarsity Press 2011).
BioLogos accepts evolution as God’s
means of creation through natural processes (a.k.a. “evolutionary creation”), but
rejects the intelligent design hypothesis (which takes some features of life’s
origin or development to be better explained in terms of intelligent causation).
To further understand the scientific
merits—and alleged faults—of intelligent design (ID), I recommend the debate “Is Intelligent Design Viable?” (YouTube 2009; transcript available here). This
debate is a respectful, high-level intellectual interaction between Francisco
Ayala, an anti-ID biologist and former president of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science, and William Lane Craig, a pro-ID philosopher of
science and Christian apologist (website: Reasonable Faith).
Next time I will share my thoughts
about some philosophical matters relevant to the overall conversation about
science and the Bible. More specifically, I will make a case for thinking that
God’s revelation via nature and God’s revelation via Scripture have domains
which overlap.
Hendrik
van der Breggen, PhD, is associate professor of philosophy at Providence
University College. The views in this column do not always reflect the views of Providence.
No comments:
Post a Comment